Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dav Nim (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. asilvering (talk) 21:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dav Nim

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article recreated after 2022 deletion, but the sourcing fails to show WP:SIGCOV in independent, reliable sources, and thus the subject once again fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Cambodia. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and SALT - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – There are four sources in Cambodian, could anyone check them? Svartner (talk) 01:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Svartner I ran machine translation on all four as part of my BEFORE. Assuming the translation was reasonably accurate they are either WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS or WP:ROUTINE match/transfer coverage, not WP:SIGCOV. In any case, they're each only a few paragraphs long so not enough to get into any depth on Nim. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No WP:SIGCOV. Seems like author is trying to stretch info to make article seem substantial. Chris1834 Talk 21:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.