Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datz Music Lounge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:25, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Datz Music Lounge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Shortlived music website, with coverage at the time, but doesn't appear to be much more than initial hype about the platform. Doesn't appear to offer encyclopedic value. Sadads (talk) 23:08, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 06:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 06:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 06:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as the nominator says, all that's available is initial hype. This fails WP:SUSTAINED. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 20:54, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and StraussInTheHouse. No references in almost ten years proves the lack of WP:SUSTAINED and almost every external link is dead. Ifnord (talk) 22:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.