Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datasheet Archive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Datasheet Archive

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod contested by creator or sock before. Created likely by the company employee (User:DatasheetArchive...). The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 11:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 11:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 11:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, possibly speedy: does not meet WP:NCORP & borderline WP:A7. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with all of the above, borderline A7. Utterly fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.