Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datagogies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Datagogies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author-contested PROD. Neologism that fails WP:GNG. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 14:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 11:09, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article provides current information that is verified by information on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EJET63 (talk • contribs) 11:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the only evidence provided that this term exists and is used is a single journal article from 2008. ElKevbo (talk) 14:21, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No attempt made to provide evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:00, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been reinforced with sources and references confirming and verifying its existence and relevance to users navigating Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EJET63 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.