Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DataExpress
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. m.o.p 04:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- DataExpress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found zero significant coverage. Non-notable software. SL93 (talk) 18:49, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 19:32, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not delete - this page will be edited. Please provide some latitudes in time to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmarost (talk • contribs) 16:32, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There is nothing preventing you from capturing that information (say, for example, putting it in your WP:User pages) for use at a later time. Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL, so notability needs to exist now and not in the future. If you can provide evidence of notability then please do so. -Rushyo Talk 13:50, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as no assertion of WP:N and no significant coverage. -Rushyo Talk 13:50, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as having insufficient coverage in independent third-party sources. If such sources are integrated into the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Allow the creator to userify if they like. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:19, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.