Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danilo Ursini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danilo Ursini

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist. Fails WP:GNG with zero Google News hits and zero Google News Archive hits. Only reference is to some sort of Altavista clone (self-published). Only reason I didn't speedy for A7 is because the author/subject claims that they have an exhibition in the Louvre. I smell a hoax but I don't have any information that proves it to be other than a gut feeling. OlYeller^Talktome 13:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I didn't see sources for a biography on Google and Yahoo.SwisterTwister talk 03:01, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, perhaps speedy delete. No evidence of notability anywhere. I agree that this appears to be a hoax, for various reasons. For example, I have no doubt that if he had had an exhibition at the Louvre then there would be reliable sources saying so, and the Louvre's own site would have information about that exhibition. Instead, the Louvre site's search facility responds to a search for "Danilo Ursini" with "Sorry, no documents matching your query were found", and the mentions that I can find for the claim of a Louvre exhibition are on Wikipedia, Ursini's own site, MySpace, etc. Likely hoax, and certainly no evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:11, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

completing nomination: listed at AfD's log - Nabla (talk) 18:01, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nabla. I was notified today about the mistake and was just coming around to fix it. I use Twinkle so I'm not sure what happened. It looks like it completed the rest of the notifications but somehow missed listing it in the AfD log. Anyway, thanks for taking care of it. I'll watch more carefully to make sure that Twinkle is working as intended. OlYeller^Talktome 18:06, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Nabla (talk) 18:19, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this subject is eligible for an article but this is not it. Phearson (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence of notability. Even if the subject be eligible for an article, the present text would need to be rewritten completely, so it wouldn't help to keep it for later. Nyttend (talk) 12:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Possible hoax, fails WP:V. Pburka (talk) 17:16, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.