Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Baylis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - filelake shoe  14:14, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Baylis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-encyclopedic and of very questionable notability. Renton40 (talk) 04:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notablePianoDan (talk) 04:42, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable and reads like a Facebook fan page with a whiff of self-promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.205.103.197 (talk) 18:57, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.162.125.152 (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There hasn't been any substantive discussion on this over the past week (which in itself indicates non-notability), so I'll elaborate on what I first wrote. This article is essentially about some guy and what he's done, including how he leased his apartment (!), where he went to school, and that he traveled the word and will be self-publishing a book about it. Two refs are minor articles about his adventure; the following three refs are direct links to his own blog pieces, one of which is clearly self-promotion of his start-up business venture. I'm hoping others can take a look at this and chime in (especially since two of the delete votes were unsigned), but as it stands now, the consensus is Delete. Renton40 (talk) 18:10, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.