Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DahliaOS
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Google Fuchsia. Seeing as there might be disagreement about whether any material can be merged over; the only detailed argument is by Finlay McWalter and points against a merger but there wasn't enough discussion to definitively establish it as the consensus. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:48, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DahliaOS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSOFT. Dewritech (talk) 09:39, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dewritech (talk) 09:39, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 10:19, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 10:19, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 10:19, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Merge Merge to Google Fuchsia as per short text, context in WP:MERGEREASON.--PATH SLOPU 13:59, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - anyone can fork an open source project, and there's no independent evidence this fork is notable. Do not merge: there is nothing here supported by a WP:RS, so there is nothing of encyclopedic value to merge. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 20:10, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Merge to Google Fuchsia. This can just be inserted to that article instead of having its own article. INeedSupport :3 18:19, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
don't delete.
Merge if you really want to, idc, but there's no point in deleting useful information.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.139.78 (talk) 19:52, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.