Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWService

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:38, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DWService

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software company that fails WP:GNG. Originally written as a copyvio that likely had promotional intent, but that has been removed now. Sourcing doesn't indicate why we should keep it in the encyclopedia. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:36, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails GNG>Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: My searches are finding no evidence of notability, whether by WP:NSOFT, or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 18:07, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.