Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DREAMdirect Group
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I don't generally delete with just one supporting comment, but a quick look at the page was enough. If this had been nominated as a CSD A7 I would have zapped it. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:29, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DREAMdirect Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
12-year-old contested PROD; WP:BEFORE indicates it does not meet the WP:NCORP notability threshold. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Strong candidate for WP:A7 or even "Draftification" (given no references), which given the fact it has hardly been edited in 10 years, would have killed it off. This company is not notable in Britain, and there is no British quality RS of which they are the subject article. Britishfinance (talk) 15:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.