Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNA Baser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DNA Baser

Article appears to be spam, not an encyclopedia article. Lack of WP:RS (as of this writing) is also troublesome. Ecoleetage (talk) 14:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The page is under construction. Please wait to be finished. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fedra (talk • contribs) 14:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article improved. No promotional language is used. The spam tag can be removed now.

See the talk page for follow ups. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fedra (talk • contribs) 15:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you, but the basic problems remain regarding WP:RS and language that appears to be more promotional than educational. Ecoleetage (talk) 15:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update Please be aware that the author of this article has attempted to remove it from the AfD slate: [1] Ecoleetage (talk) 18:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. Article does not present any independent sources. As a result, it's unclear that this is a significant (notable) software product. The text is still borderline on being blatant promotion. —C.Fred (talk) 18:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:49, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:SPAM and WP:RS. When I see terms like 'During its trial period the program is fully functional', it makes you wonder if there are crystall ball issues here too. Artene50 (talk) 04:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete - for now, it is WP:SPAM. It may be able to be resurrected as a part of an article on programs used for sequencing later. LonelyBeacon (talk) 06:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.