Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Flash

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 08:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Flash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A over the top mess of promotion, original research and dud sources. Non notable DJ. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Claimed chart for Hudson is not a goodchart and not for him. Charting for Dr. Dre is for Dr. Dre, not DJ Flash. Sourcing is a bunch of self published (sites.google, angelfire, facebook) and shops. None are independent reliable sources that contain any depth of coverage about him. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edited. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:55, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:40, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.