Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DHTMLX

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. I'm closing as "soft' delete as arguments, other than noms, were "weak" delete. Preferably reliable secondary sources will be available to the requester. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DHTMLX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable sources. — Newslinger talk 14:14, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 14:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 14:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 14:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. So, there's a book about this library, for some reason, but Packt, the publisher, is a print-on-demand press and so it's an SPS. I got a fair number of Google Scholar hits, but none provide significant coverage, and I can't see how a verifiable article could be assembled from them. Enterprisey (talk!) 07:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 03:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.