Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DBTestDriven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 18:31, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DBTestDriven

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find secondary sources to support claim of notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Zero hits in google books => spam bin. Tijfo098 (talk) 09:04, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The subject has not been widely covered by reliable secondary sources. A search for news articles doesn't bring up anything. There is no indication that it meets the general notability criteria.--xanchester (t) 03:30, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't find any reliable secondary sources. After reading artical it is aso not clear to me if this is supposed to be a concept or a specific software... Most of the text apare to be copied from [1]. Runarb (talk) 10:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Zero evidence of coverage in reliable sources after a search in news, books and the web. Fails WP:GNG and other more specific guidelines. --Batard0 (talk) 15:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.