Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DAVIX
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DAVIX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This doesn't meet any part of WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 14:50, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 02:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 02:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with Boleyn there’s nothing to suggest notability with this topic. Tangential, but after 12 years on this site the relevant WikiProject hasn’t even assigned it a rating. Mccapra (talk) 02:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with both statements above. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.