Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cynthia Witthoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cynthia Witthoft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the existence, or lack of existence of this guitarist. Apparently there is a question on that point, e.g., [1], not that that's a particularly reliable set of data either. No evidence of notability under GNG nor MUSICBIO. Additiona sources welcome, as always. joe decker ^{talk to me} 06:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:32, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If this is a hoax, perhaps it is a notable hoax. Someone created the music and videos credited to Cynthia Witthoft on YouTube. http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynthia_Witthoft and http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynthia_Witthoft have both been deleted. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:32, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources are unreliable. All her singles and albums haven't hit any charts. If there was a Polish Zombies article, I would've redirected it instead. Minima © (talk) 06:35, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - either non-notable musician or non-notable hoax. Existence =/= notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:SPAM. - DonCalo (talk) 19:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; I almost tagged it A7 when I first saw it, but I noticed the AfD here. Not even an attempt to show notability, and no references. Therefore, delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 23:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; Not a hoax, but not notable. Only sources are YouTube and social networking sites. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.