Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cymer
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cymer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly advertorial article for a non-notable limited liability company, the few citations that have been scattered into the article are industry publications or commercial websites. Fails WP:NCORP, time for it to go. Sionk (talk) 22:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sionk (talk) 22:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. There are a few quality sources on some of their products, but not on the company itself. Fails WP:NCORP.4meter4 (talk) 16:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.