Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cybil Bennett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List_of_Silent_Hill_characters#Cybil_Bennett. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 05:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cybil Bennett

Article fails notability and verifiability, save for a brief mention by Gay Gamer. Remaining article content is a summary of plot details from other articles and original research. Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:42, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I assume the silent hill game itself could be considered a source for verifiability. As for notability however... redirect to Silent Hill. --fvw * 22:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Silent Hill characters#Cybil Bennett for now, no burning need for a separate article. Someone another 00:36, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Silent Hill characters#Cybil Bennett, as noted there doesn't appear to be a benefit in having this character in a separate article, as well as the notability issues. Icemotoboy (talk) 22:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Silent Hill characters#Cybil Bennett, due to a lack of coverage in reliable third-party sources. Can't meet our guidelines. Randomran (talk) 08:56, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any harm in the Cybil article staying. She wasn't a one time character. She did appear in the movie and Silent Hill: Play Novel. I don't want to start a ten year edit war. If you decide to delete it, let us know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.106.54.27 (talk) 01:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.