Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberConXion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A7 nothing here indicates significance, and it should have been listed for speedy instead of AfD DGG ( talk ) 22:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CyberConXion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This may have been somewhat known locally in Pennsylvania and New Jersey and I'm simply nominating because the low amount of good solid sources to even at least suggest local notability; my searches were here, here, here and here. At best, this could be mentioned elsewhere but as an orphan there's no obvious target. SwisterTwister talk 06:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.