Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubreta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:37, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cubreta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A recently made up international auxiliary language that has no discernable notability. I can not find a single reference to this language at all in any reliable source. The only source actually used in the article is to the languages official site, which itself is only a blog. Based on the username of the page creator, this article was created by the one cited as the creator of the language, as well. PROD was removed by the creator without comment. Rorshacma (talk) 07:42, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, obviously. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:20, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:54, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One might even say speedy delete — but gently. —Tamfang (talk) 00:22, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.