Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryoshell

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 May 1.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 15:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cryoshell

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSIC. I cannot find a record label for them, nor charting for singles or albums; nothing. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 14:42, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are dependent on this article's notability:

Delete fails notability per above. (GregJackP (talk) 14:52, 8 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Delete no evidence of notability, no sources. Rklawton (talk) 16:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find any refs establishing notability either (I didn't knock myself out, I confess). -Quartermaster (talk) 16:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball delete all for lack of reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Here is the link for the website: http://www.cryoshell.com/ ( its under oficiální stránka for some reason.)Also, cryoshell is mentioned here:http://blog.advance.dk/?s=cryoshell , and here: http://bionicle.lego.com/en-US/news/ByeByeBabylon.aspx http://bionicle.lego.com/en-US/news/CloserToTheTruth.aspx .User talk:Josh145
Delete. A band formed by an advertising company to produce jingles for a particular product line, who have not even issued a single album, have no radio play, no hit singles, and have apparently never performed live, let alone toured. The references given above are the band's own website, the blog for the advertising agency that put the group together, and pages on the client's site offering tracks for download; none of these can be considered reliable sources independent of the subject by any means. Fails WP:BAND by a long shot. It's spam for advertisements. Nuke the song & EP articles too. — Gwalla | Talk 23:01, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ They are going to release an album this year. User talk:Josh145

Comment - Josh145, you only get to vote once, but you may add additional comments. Second, deleting the votes of other editors, as you did with the vote by Gwalla is considered vandalism, and will result in your ability to edit being blocked. (GregJackP (talk) 03:01, 10 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Comment: One album not released by a notable label doesn't have any significant sales to suggest notability and therefore it violates WP:CRYSTAL. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 15:11, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I hate wikipedia! Cryoshell is real!!!!!!.User:Catman224 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.51.140.101 (talk) 20:25, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply: Silly Anon, it's not a debate on whether they're real; it's a debate on whether they're notable! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 20:49, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I hate all of you! User:Catman224 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.51.140.101 (talk) 02:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problem here mate, the band does not HAVE to be extremely notable. They have already catapaulted Bionicle's 2008 year up like crazy with their singles and their EP does have quite good sales. Check out the facebook pages, simply look up Cryoshell there. They are really getting popular and deleting them would result in someone making it again, I'm very sure. 74.83.38.60 (talk) 00:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep BTW 74.83.38.60 (talk) 00:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing, WHY DO YOU WANT THIS PAGE GONE SO BAD??? As stated on your "Notablilty" page, it says an editor does NOT have to delete the article if there is proof the topic stated exists and made some kind of interesting achievement. How many bands can you think of that get to perform for LEGO, and then make that years line doubly popular? 74.83.38.60 (talk) 00:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because it doesn't meet notability standards, and wikipedia is not a junkyard. (GregJackP (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Link to EP on iTunes: http://itunes.apple.com/dk/album/creeping-in-my-soul-ep/id348466180 . Also, they are not "Junk", they are up-and-coming. You really need to understand the difference between a band that never releases anything and a band that is coming out in a few months. 72.49.247.22 (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.