Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowdsolving
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Crowdsourcing. Anything worth merging is still available from the article history. Randykitty (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Crowdsolving (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A coined term, no notable uses cited. Alredy previously deleted forsomething invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally PoliceSheep99 (talk) 17:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment a google search shows that this term is widely used and appears in the websites of many organisations, so this article isn’t just one person’s attempt to foist a neologism in the world. By its nature it appears mostly in blogs, corporate websites etc. and I don’t see any scholarly refs or newspapers of record. The basic issue for me is that Wikipedia is not a dictionary so my preferred outcome would be to keep this, tag it for copying to Wiktionary, and delete it after it’s made its way there. Mccapra (talk) 06:11, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Merge to Crowdsourcing. Plenty of coverage in recent years, many google scholar and books hits. wumbolo ^^^ 22:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to Crowdsourcing; don't see anything to merge. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep It's easy to find a source for this such as this. Merger is a possibibility but there are multiple targets including The Wisdom of Crowds; Collective intelligence; Collective_problem_solving; Group decision-making and many more. Andrew D. (talk) 14:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 15:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 15:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.