Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cross platform promotion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 03:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cross platform promotion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article written by an editor with a single purpose to promote the Grattons and their work. This article is basically an advertisement for their book, which introduces the idea of 'cross platform promotion' (in fact this article is probably a good example of the self-promotion strategy they advocate). Article is sourced to the Grattons or their publisher, apart from a local newspaper article. I can't see anything else online that is not a social media source or linked to the Grattons. Fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 14:13, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a neologism without significant coverage in independent sources. The local newspaper doesn't mention CPP at all; all the other sources are directly associated with the Grattons. Huon (talk) 15:17, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:51, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:51, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:20, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is just an attempt to get multiple articles on the same non-notable subject. That is a characteristic sign of promotionalism DGG ( talk ) 01:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.