Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crony Records
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MuZemike 06:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Crony Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable label per guidelines of either WP:CORP or WP:MUSIC PKT(alk) 22:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —PKT(alk) 22:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —PKT(alk) 22:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this record label. Joe Chill (talk) 23:09, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:04, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmm. I found a few hits using Google News, but I am not yet convinced of notability--I'm going to hold off, for now, hoping that another editor might fare better than I did. Drmies (talk) 21:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.