Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crestview Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:42, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crestview Partners

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of passing WP:GNG/WP:NCOMPANY. Sources are in passing (such as the NYT one liner [1]), primary, press releases (PR Newswire) or their reprints (such as the other NYT source which lists the press release as their source at the bottom: [2]) and anyway all concern routine business operations. WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:36, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:36, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:07, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 04:37, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most of the sources are press releases, and the one citation that references the New York Times is a textbook example of a source that does not confer notability on its subject: as in this example: "The New York Times is reliable, independent, and secondary – but not significant (a single-sentence mention in an article about another company)." That is exactly what this is. Vexations (talk) 22:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only passing mentions by reliable sources and significant coverage from press releases. NavjotSR (talk) 12:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.