Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creditinform

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creditinform

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a non-notable company. It has no references at all. FeralOink (talk) 05:18, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An unreferenced article about an Experian subsidiary. It is mentioned in some routine announcements and listings and in providing media with numbers of bankruptcies in Norway, but I am not seeing substantial coverage of the company itself. (Note a similarly named Equifax / Capital One product.) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. (A redirect/mention on the Experian page could be an option, but would need distinction from the Capital One product and to be based on referenced text.) AllyD (talk) 06:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - TheMagnificentist 11:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No notability per WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 00:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:12, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.