Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coverfox (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Virtually identical to the previously deleted version MelanieN (talk) 03:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coverfox

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A great many references, every one of them an apparent press release, in sources notorious for publishing such material. Extensive contributions by now-banned sockpuppet -- see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amitabhaitc DGG ( talk ) 19:37, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- same as the first AfD in 2016; could this be "speedy deleted" as a recreation of previously deleted material? K.e.coffman (talk) 02:26, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom Will tag for G4.Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.