Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corridor Digital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Corridor Digital

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:WEB, WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Non-notable YouTube channel, lacks mass coverage outside of YouTube. First source is the YouTube channel, the second being the about us section on the YouTube channel's personal website, and the 3rd source being CorridorDigital's Patreon. Sources are therefore all primary and fail to show why the channel is notable outside of YouTube. CatcherStorm ^talk 12:36, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:31, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as simply none of this suggest a better notable article. Notifying taggers Prof. Mc and K6ka. SwisterTwister talk 21:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for all the reasons stated. I put an early "Multiple Issues" tag on it, but probably should have AfD'd it. Prof. Mc (talk) 22:07, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.