Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cool Math Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 23:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cool Math Games

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was created after a hoax that stated that the subject was shutting down was solved. I don’t see any notability per se, as it’s just one of many web-game portals. The page also has a few MOS violations that I’m currently working on fixing but I still don’t see why this needs a article in the first place. HurricaneGeek2002 talk 22:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. HurricaneGeek2002 talk 22:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Article has been nominated for speedy deletion before. HurricaneGeek2002 talk 22:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sources in the article, including Newsweek (with a short but focused article on the topic) are probably enough. There are even some academic studies which appear to have looked at this (not at work so I can't see the entire articles) such as "Understanding the relationships between interest in online math games and academic performance". It's not way over the bar, but it's notable. Hobit (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as of summer 2017, it was still active and used by the NYC DOE, when I last taught math. As of June 2019, it was still available online to students, although discouraged by educators. Bearian (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In November 2019, Popular Mechanics listed it as one of its 50 most important websites since the internet was founded. [1]. Britishfinance (talk) 20:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources in the article, including Newsweek and Popular Mechanics. Meets our general notability guidline Wm335td (talk) 20:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.