Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Context Framework

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Context Framework

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this framework is notable. –ebraminio^talk 08:16, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: no indication of notability. That said, I could probably miss some sources due to the fairly generic name, "context-sensitive" buzzword and consequent amount of search results. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:43, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 18:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No reliable sources in evidence, so this article seems to fail WP:NSOFT and WP:GNG. Given the nature of the framework (yet another component-based web MVC framework), it is not likely to meet the significance requirements of WP:NSOFT. -- BenTels (talk) 00:45, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.