Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Content Relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Content Relations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article is a marketing WP:NEOLOGISM (of the type that marketing and public relations executives make up so that they can sound clever and important). References either reinforce the concept as a neologism or do not even mention the term. No evidence of notability, subject title too vague to even properly research. KDS4444^Talk 09:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. First source fulfills WP:NOTNEO easily. FrameDrag (talk) 19:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now until better can be made. SwisterTwister talk 20:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.