Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conni Gordon
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was WP:SNOW delete in conjunction with WP:CSD#G11.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Conni Gordon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Declining db-copyvio because I'm not comfortable "overruling" OTRS, but this article oozes self-promotionalism (and dishonesty) and I would ordinarily db-spam it. I take it bjweeks restored it because copyright permission was obtained; I'll alert him. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 23:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Question - How do you know there's a OTRS ticket? Is this something only admins can see? There's currently nothing on the talk page. Thanks. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 23:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Your assumption is correct, the author emailed the permissions to OTRS (I forgot to put the talk page template). db-spam still seems to apply. BJTalk 23:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 00:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 01:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the article has apparently had the AFD tag removed, as I just tried to CSD it as a copyvio, but then noticed the OTRS tag and just tagged it with a range of things: autobiography, advertising, and COI. The article is powerfully spammy =- any article that starts with a line saying that the subject was "destined from stardom since childhood" screams "spam" to me. I'll replace the AFD tag. Tony Fox (arf!) 06:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.