Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conner Lockhart
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Minor characters of Days of our Lives. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Conner Lockhart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unsourced article about non-notable past soap opera character. Rm994 (talk) 19:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN character. JBsupreme (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- merge to a suitable list with a redirect. Every named character in a soap opera with more than a bit part in a single episode should have at least a redirect, and I challenge the nominator to give a reason why that at least would not be appropriate. DGG ( talk ) 22:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to an appropriate character list. Edward321 (talk) 14:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A merge could certainly be appropriate. Perhaps to Minor characters of Days of our Lives. Rm994 (talk) 00:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.