Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Congoro
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 17:37, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Congoro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article on a film offers no secondary sources, and notability tag was removed by single purpose contributor without any being added. I find no evidence that this meets Wikipedia:Notability (films). A google search on the combination of the full title is not useful in locating reliable sources to confirm notability, and searching for the abbreviated name (Congoro) in conjunction with the writer/star comes up solely with YouTube, here. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 15:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've tried searching Google News archives, and also a library database of newspaper and magazine articles, but can find no sources to help to establish notability. Delete unless sources are forthcoming by the end of this deletion discussion. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 16:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wikipedia:NFF and Wikipedia:N. Done the search myself... and I love to dig... There's just nothing out there past their own website and a trailer on youtube. Nothing. No trade magazines. No production rumors. No casting calls. Nothing on imdb. Zip. Zero. Nada. I'll keep looking during the course of the AfD, but there's not even a 3rd party hint about this one. Schmidt (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per evidence supplied by nom. No reliable sources, and no notability. PC78 (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, WP:RS, WP:V and WP:NFF-- Darth Mike (Talk • Contribs) 21:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Darth Mike. Cliff smith talk 15:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nomination is thorough and complete, and I have nothing more to add beyond the rationale it contains. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.