Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complete Set Character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:37, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Complete Set Character

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article with no sources and no information included such that sources can be found. Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 00:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as probable original research. I couldn't find reliable sources online that would indicate this passes WP:GNG. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 14:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 15:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find any sources to support this, and I really can't make any sense of it. It sounds like it's describing consonants, but then says that a letter is not a vowel because it sounds like "A" in "Adam". But this was created by a young kid who doesn't really have much command of English, so I don't think there's much chance of there being any value in it. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Very nearly a G1 or A1 speedy candidate. I'm at a loss to even make sense out of the contradictory descriptions in this substub, and there aren't any reliable sources that might shine light on what was intended here. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can make no sense of this article and the "sounds like" doesn't look as if it uses the wikipedia phonetic system (which I also don't understand, but at least I recognise it). -- SGBailey (talk) 10:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just doesn't make sense, and I can't locate any sources that user the term "complete set character" to describe... well, whatever the hell this is supposed to be describing. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:18, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.