Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of e-book software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:21, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of e-book software

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The concept of E-book software is likely a notable one, but unfortunately it redirects to this unreferenced and likely obsolete comparison table, that fails WP:V. Due to no references, this WP:OR table is of little use. I think we need to nuke it and hope someone will create a proper article on E-book software one day. (We also have a larger Comparison of Android e-reader software, with some refs - maybe it could work as WP:ATD-R). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:03, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Products, and Software. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:03, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:06, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete this piece of trade magazine ephemera. Mangoe (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we are not a how-to website. Bearian (talk) 23:19, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable or encyclopaedic. Raymond3023 (talk) 05:48, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.