Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of archive repair programs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of archive repair programs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another list of apparently non-notable programs aside from one that are unlikely to be notable on their own. If any warrant a mention it should probably be in the main article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 15:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 15:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTDIR . Ajf773 (talk) 18:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable per nom and Ajf773. To salvage some of the material, gymnastics and clever sourcing might make it suitable as prose for file archiver or a new archive repair program page. I haven't checked to see if the latter would be a feasible new topic. 68.173.149.120 (talk) 18:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.