Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of HTML5 Remote Desktop projects
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comparison of HTML5 Remote Desktop projects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
More specific fork of Comparison of remote desktop software - but /all/ of the entries on the HTML5 list are nonnotable software that has either never had an article or had it deleted. I think the HTML5 variant is not notable and this comparison should be deleted. I initally PRODed this, but an IP disputes deletion. MrOllie (talk) 16:18, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete— WP:TOOSOON. If these desktops take off then comparisons in reliable sources will follow. For now, sources just aren't there. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 19:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- What about http://www.admin-magazine.com/Articles/Guacamole-Remote-Desktop (an article in a magazine)? Searching on Google Scholar also reveals several papers discussing the software: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=vnc+guacamole+web&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.69.250.44 (talk) 07:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 18:48, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.