Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of 2008 automobiles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 09:01, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of 2008 automobiles

Such a list doesn't exist for other years, so it seems a bit out of place, and I don't see the value of having such lists. Furthermore, this list would need constant updating as the market shares and prices change. — Twinzor ^{Say hi!} - Do I suck or rock? 09:19, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Consumer guide, rather than encyclopedia, material. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:23, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOPRICES.—Largo Plazo (talk) 11:54, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unencyclopedic article, table of prices. And automobiles of which country? I don't buy cars in dollar. Zero Kitsune (talk) 16:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There currently is only US released cars on the list. That is because very few other people are contributing to the article. It is listed in United States Dollars because it is the only current info I could find.Spitfire (talk) 16:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is to be deleted than Comparison of Web Browsers should be deleted to. Spitfire (talk) 16:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Since the issues of concern (price guide; market share that changes from one moment to the next; market in which country?) in your article aren't present in the comparison of web browsers article, that isn't a valid conclusion.—Largo Plazo (talk) 16:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 21:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, it could easily be renamed 2008 in automobiles, populated with Category:Vehicles introduced in 2008, and the prices removed. --Pixelface (talk) 21:38, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would support that, granted that the market share info is dropped as well, but I think that would qualify as a new article, since basically nothing would be used from this one. — Twinzor ^{Say hi!} - Do I suck or rock? 22:08, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Something that belongs in a car magazine. Mvjs Talking 05:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The author removed the Under Construction tag and wrote in the edit summary that he's lost interest. I think this article is, therefore, a lost cause. WP:SNOWBALL?—Largo Plazo (talk) 23:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.