Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commie (slur)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Commie (slur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:DICDEF. This is an unreferenced dictionary definition for something that already exists on Wiktionary. Originally prodded, but article creator removed the prod notice. Scjessey (talk) 19:58, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per A10 criteria. - Redundant article with no relevant information to merge into Communism, which covers the information implied in this article. As that Commie already redirects to Communism, a redirect is not appropriate in this case. Trusilver 22:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as dictionary definition, or an unsourced original essay — take your pick. Carrite (talk) 03:28, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Send to the gulagdelete - as noted above, a dictionary definition with no possibility of growth aside from content-forking of Anti-communism. - The Bushranger One ping only 15:57, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Speedy delete per nom. & others, as well as WP:NOR. WP is not a dictionary.--JayJasper (talk) 17:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP is not a dictionary. If author wants to improve the existing Wiktionary definition, then do so. If there is scope for an encyclopedia entry, then come back with an encyclopedia entry, not this. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 05:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as dictionary definition. First Light (talk) 04:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.