Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collision Conference

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Collision Conference

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What secondary sourcing there is here is not enough for this to pass the GNG. Plus, what there is is really not great--this is basically an op-ed piece that does little more than promote, and this reads the same way. This might help--but it's actually not about this particular conference, if it's anything at all, but points at the walled garden that this seems to be part of. Drmies (talk) 04:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:58, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:32, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:32, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:32, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a variety of extra sources to show the notability of the conference, such as coverage from USA Today, The Guardian, and Inc.com. The USA Today article suggests that Collision Conference is the biggest rival to SXSW, which already has a very established Wikipedia page. Similar smaller, not as notable, events already have Wikipedia pages such as Slush and Dublin Tech Summit with less notable sources than Collision. If these events are considered notable enough for Wikipedia, then Collision is too. --JordanSamBoyd (talk) 09:02, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:29, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Sources fail WP:ORGDEPTH, being passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP coverage. The page exists to promote the event and its organizers. An apparent walled garden around Web Summit, the parent company. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Coffman's SPIP point.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.