Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ColWiz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Comparison of reference management software. v/r - T P 02:44, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ColWiz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could find exactly one non-affiliated source that is not somebody's blog (which I cited), so the notability criteria of WP:NSOFT have not been met unless someone finds a second one. Seems like a case of WP:TOOSOON, even after editing the page from an ad to something article-like. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:54, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:00, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Comparison of reference management software. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:25, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Merge per Candleabracadabra - Pointillist (talk) 23:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tentative Keep—I see two references in the article now, and unless we are calling the Spinouts reference unreliable, I think that's enough to show notability. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 17:34, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Comparison of reference management software - I'm not sure that the Spinouts article is enough to show notability, as it is only a short mention (a couple of paragraphs). PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.