Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codalogic LMX
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Codalogic LMX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The usual searches reveal no coverage by independent reliable sources, except for information added by the vendor. No other indication that the software is notable. decltype (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 09:36, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:39, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. This is a C++ XML Data Binding Code generation tool. It converts XML Schemas that describe valid application specific XML instances into C++ classes that mirror the structure of the XML Schemas. Obviously, no home should be without one. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 02:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:BURDEN. Miami33139 (talk) 18:24, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Ihcoyc and Joe Chill. No reliable sources found to verify notability. GlassCobra 15:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.