Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CocoOS
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 11:46, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- CocoOS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find adequate coverage in reliable sources to show that this software product is notable. VQuakr (talk) 03:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment cocoOS is listed on this independent list of RTOS for AVR [1].
- Comment cocoOS serves an educational purpose with it's implementation of coroutines and how a scheduling kernel is built up using this programming model.
- Comment cocoOS is used by students around the world.
- Ptrxtrnd (talk) 09:46, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- … none of which has any bearing upon the application of deletion policy. Sources! Sources! Sources! Uncle G (talk) 22:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular talk 07:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 09:41, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Some of the sources are in other languages too. Endofskull (talk) 14:47, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.