Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cnick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:38, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cnick

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability: apart perhaps from the Georgian journal article (which is in itself a rather strange and gushing text), the others are just rehashed press releases (e.g. the Interesting Engineering article copies whole bits straight from the Cnick Teslaring homepage), not actual independent, journalistic bits. Other sources one can find are of the same ilk (e.g. this interview is just a free promo piece, not an actual interview or a sign of a newspaper or magazine having true interest in the company. Fram (talk) 10:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thanks for this discussion. After you started it I've added two more resources in the article (in Georgian). Both of sites (Marketer.ge and Entrepreneur.com) are the most reliable and frequently used resources about business in Georgia (you can check it, maybe you need translation). One of them (Entrepreneur.com) is the official Georgian language edition of a worldwide trustworthy magazine Entrepreneur. Both of them are secondary sources and aren't press releases or something like that. Besides, in the article, there has been added information about expansion up to 20 countries (Attested by article from Entrepreneur.com). Overall, the article fully follows the notability guideline and each of its rules, as well as all of Wikipedia standards.--Saliner (talk) 13:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It will be up to others to decide: I personally am always very wary of these companies which claim to be active in countries X, Y and Z, but where the only sources are from their home country, and not a single source in (e.g. in this case) Australia and New Zealand has commented on it. Fram (talk) 13:59, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Coverage fails WP:ORGCRIT so it would not meet WP:NCORP. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see anything that doesn't look like a press release, nothing in Gnews or newspapers. Oaktree b (talk)`
Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails NCORP HighKing⁺⁺ 17:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.