Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clika
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was draftify. ✗plicit 03:54, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Clika (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacking significant coverage by indpendent sources, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 09:32, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:50, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. jolielover♥talk 10:40, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Draftify – WP:TOOSOON. Svartner (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 15:11, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- Draftify- agree with what Svartner pointed out, to give the film more time to gain SIGCOV citations, found most hits from Google news doesn't go past mar. 2025 like these 31, 32 so far. Lorraine Crane (talk) 00:12, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.