Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClickTheCity.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ClickTheCity.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

advertising The Banner talk 16:54, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 17:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 17:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 17:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

* Delete. This article is just a soapbox. Anyone can see that. EMachine03 (talk) 21:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. per above - No evidence of any notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 23:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP doesn't need an article for every entertainment directory. JacobiJonesJr (talk) 02:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Already toned down its promotional content. This is the Timeout.com and Fandango.com of the Philippines and there is no question as to its notability.1 2 3 4--RioHondo (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The advertising problems have been watered down by @RioHondo . EMachine03 (talk) 13:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 15:00, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.