Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cl4pers
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cl4pers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Up and coming teenage musician, I can't find the sources to support notability. BEFORE only found [thehypemagaz ine.com/2022/07/02/check-out-cl4pers-want-me-out-now-exclusively-via-united-masters/] this short piece, which isn't really enough to push the subject over the WP:GNG (especially given his young age ). 5th time this page has been re-created,[1] best to let the community decide. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 01:05, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Texas. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 01:05, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, and it should probably be salted. EatingCarBatteries (contributions, talk) 02:26, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - I nominated this for speedy deletion yesterday because it was copied word for word from Genius. Clearly not a notable musician (yet), and I agree that it should be salted so the page isn't re-created.
- If the user continues this behaviour I will probably go to ANI -- a look at their talk page shows speedy deletion of at least a dozen articles and multiple warnings. They are also continuing to create articles with no sources. Aesurias (talk) 03:47, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Let's give them a few days to find their feet; as many times as this page has been deleted, I mentioned that mostly to show that draftification is likely not a good, long-term option. The G12s have pretty much no bearing on the subject's notability, and while I can't see what the article text looked like when it was A7-ed, the genius page they were copied from has (as of now, anyway) a textbook CCS (creating a popular song), indicating that the A7s may have been a bit liberally applied. I'd rather not fault any one party for that. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 03:11, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- That last CSD deletion was basically also the same content that kept getting G12'd. Pennecaster (Chat with Senne) 06:23, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Let's give them a few days to find their feet; as many times as this page has been deleted, I mentioned that mostly to show that draftification is likely not a good, long-term option. The G12s have pretty much no bearing on the subject's notability, and while I can't see what the article text looked like when it was A7-ed, the genius page they were copied from has (as of now, anyway) a textbook CCS (creating a popular song), indicating that the A7s may have been a bit liberally applied. I'd rather not fault any one party for that. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 03:11, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Delete and salt not much I can say, per nom and Aesurias Z E T A3 03:56, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. No sources to establish notability. Galaxybeing (talk) 04:42, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Delete No sources, extremely poor quality article in general. RoseCherry64 (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Doesn't meet MUSICBIO. This editor is already on my watchlist for disruptive page creation. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:56, 7 November 2025 (UTC)