Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Bray
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Chris Bray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is clearly overly promotional in its tone and nature, shows a poor notability claim and is primarily referenced to primary sources (those put about by the subject or his sponsor/employer). --Narson ~ Talk • 15:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Article is overly promotional and some sources are questionable. While the subject might have an accomplished career, notability isn't established. - Shiftchange (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete looks like WP:AUTOBIO, with many non reliable sources. LibStar (talk) 01:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.