Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chirag Paswan
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Miley Naa Miley Hum. (non-admin closure) —Tom Morris (talk) 21:41, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Chirag Paswan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NACTOR which requires "significant roles in multiple notable films" for notability of an actor. It might be too soon for an article this early in his career. Alternatively, merge or redirect to Miley naa Miley hum. Muhandes (talk) 09:33, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Miley naa Miley hum without prejudice per WP:NotJustYet. While the actor currently fails W:ENT, he DOES have a lot of sourcability for his role in that film. So let's send readers to where they may read about his acting debut in context to the film in which he makes it. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:26, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I totally agree, did not think of that. Added it as an option to the proposal. --Muhandes (talk) 12:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I would agree with redirect or merging the information to the article Miley naa Miley hum. It is, however, quite unusual that a film debut is so widely noted by important national media. Maybe that's because he is the son of a notable politician? --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 12:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That would also be my guess. --Muhandes (talk) 12:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.